CSCSTI 73.01

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING METHODS FOR DEVELOPING CORRESPONDENCE MATRICES

Published in Modern Technologies and Scientific and Technological Progress · Volume 2021, Issue 1 · Pages 181–182 · Rubric: CONSTRUCTION AND TRANSPORT
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36629/2686-9896-2021-1-1-181-182
Received: 12.05.2021 Accepted: 10.01.2022 Published: 10.01.2022
Authors
The study is aimed at comparing the methods of restoring correspondence matrices, the traditional transport school and modern mobile technologies. Traditionally, correspondence matrices are restored by interviewing vehicle drivers and applying gravity models (to extrapolate and fill in unobserved movements), then matrix estimation methods are used to calculate traffic flows. Each of these approaches has a number of advantages and disadvantages, but there is no evidence to assess the quality of the data obtained.
correspondence matrices, transport planning, models
Text References
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Toloueia R, Psarrasa S, Prince R. Origin-Destination Trip Matrix Development: Conventional Methods versus Mobile Phone Data // Transportation Research Procedia 26, 2017. - pp. 39-52.

2. Lebedeva O.A., Kripak M.N. Modelirovanie gruzovyh perevozok v transportnoy seti // Vestnik Angarskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. 2016. № 10. S. 182-184